General information

IMO:
MMSI:
244060767
Callsign:
PG7673
Width:
12.0 m
Length:
110.0 m
Deadweight:
Gross tonnage:
TEU:
Liquid Capacity:
Year of build:
Class:
AIS type:
Cargo Ship
Ship type:
Flag:
Netherlands
Builder:
Owner:
Operator:
Insurer:

Course/Position

Position:
Navigational status:
Moving
Course:
216.0° / 0.0
Heading:
216.0° / 0.0
Speed:
Max speed:
Status:
moving
Area:
France
Last seen:
2025-07-30
2 days ago
Source:
T-AIS
From:
Destination:
ETA:
Summer draft:
Current draft:
Last update:
2 days ago
Source:
T-AIS

Not visible with your account? Upgrade here...

Upgrade

Latest ports

Port
Arrival
Departure
Duration
2025-07-29
2025-07-29
24m
2025-07-26
2025-07-28
1d 8h 56m
2025-07-25
2025-07-26
6h 53m
2025-07-24
2025-07-24
5h 34m
2025-07-23
2025-07-23
22m
2025-07-21
2025-07-23
2d 1h 36m
2025-07-19
2025-07-21
1d 22h 7m
2025-07-19
2025-07-19
30m
2025-07-17
2025-07-18
23h 5m
2025-07-16
2025-07-17
1d 2h 44m
Note: All times are in UTC

Latest Waypoints

Waypoints
Time
Direction
Hans Weert
2025-07-23
Enter
Terneuzen
2025-07-23
Leave
Vlissingen Port
2025-07-23
Enter
Vlissingen Port
2025-07-21
Leave
Note: All times are in UTC

Latest news

Owner of Perficio entitled to limit its liability for damage caused by the allision with lifting bridge in 2023

Tue Jul 29 10:37:20 CEST 2025 Timsen

The Rotterdam District Court has ruled that the owner of the 'Perficio' is entitled to limit its liability for damage caused by the allision with the lifting bridge at Humbeek-Sas on June 29, 2023. The judge rejected an attempt by the Flemish government to halt the Dutch proceedings in favour of a Belgian lawsuit. The accident had caused significant damage to the bridge. De Vlaamse Waterweg NV (DVW), the bridge's manager, held the vessel and its owners liable. Shortly thereafter,the Perficio Shipping, together with its insurer EOC, initiated limitation proceedings in the Netherlands. With these proceedings, ship owners attempt to financially limit their liability, based on the international CLNI Convention. A few days later, DVW also initiated civil proceedings in Belgium, demanding, among other things, that the ship owner not be entitled to limitation of liability. The Belgian case preceded the Dutch proceedings, and the Rotterdam court should therefore postpone its judgment (the so-called lis pendens defense). However, the court disagreed: the limitation proceedings in Rotterdam had been initiated earlier and constituted the starting point for the subsequent substantive proceedings, the so-called reckless proceedings. The case in Rotterdam revolved solely around the question of whether the damage was caused by intent or gross negligence on the part of the shipowner or their representatives. Only in that case would there be no right to limitation of liability. The court concluded that this was not the case: there was no evidence that the allision was caused by consciously risky behaviour or intent. The court also ruled that the CLNI Convention contained sufficiently clear rules and that no additional Belgian or Dutch law was necessary for its interpretation. Consequently, the court also rejected the DVW's subsidiary request to adjourn the case until the Belgian expert investigation by the Nautical Commission has been fully completed. As a result, the Perficio Shipping and its insurer may settle the claim within the limits of the limitation fund they established. DVW has been ordered to pay over €2,000 in legal costs.

Upload News

Daily average speed

Not visible with your account? Upgrade here...

Upgrade

Distance travelled

Not visible with your account? Upgrade here...

Upgrade

Ship master data